Home > EIGRP & OSPF Questions

EIGRP & OSPF Questions

March 16th, 2020 in ENCOR 350-401 Go to comments

Question 1

Explanation

The following different OSPF types are compatible with each other:

+ Broadcast and Non-Broadcast (adjust hello/dead timers)
+ Point-to-Point and Point-to-Multipoint (adjust hello/dead timers)

Broadcast and Non-Broadcast networks elect DR/BDR so they are compatible. Point-to-point/multipoint do not elect DR/BDR so they are compatible.

Question 2

Explanation

On Ethernet interfaces the OSPF hello intervl is 10 second by default so in this case there would be a Hello interval mismatch -> the OSPF adjacency would not be established.

Question 3

Explanation

This combination of commands is known as “Conditional debug” and will filter the debug output based on your conditions. Each condition added, will behave like an ‘And’ operator in Boolean logic. Some examples of the “debug ip ospf hello” are shown below:

*Oct 12 14:03:32.595: OSPF: Send hello to 224.0.0.5 area 0 on FastEthernet1/0 from 192.168.12.2
*Oct 12 14:03:33.227: OSPF: Rcv hello from 1.1.1.1 area 0 on FastEthernet1/0 from 192.168.12.1
*Oct 12 14:03:33.227: OSPF: Mismatched hello parameters from 192.168.12.1

Question 4

Explanation

If we configured an EIGRP stub router so that it only advertises connected and summary routes. But we also want to have an exception to this rule then we can configure a leak-map. For example:

R4(config-if)#router eigrp 1
R4(config-router)#eigrp stub
R4(config)#ip access-list standard R4_L0opback0
R4(config-std-nacl)#permit host 4.4.4.4
R4(config)#route-map R4_L0opback0_LEAKMAP
R4(config-route-map)#match ip address R4_L0opback0
R4(config)#router eigrp 1
R4(config-router)#eigrp stub leak-map R4_L0opback0_LEAKMAP

As we can see the leak-map feature goes long with ‘eigrp stub’ command.

Question 5

Explanation

EIGRP provides a mechanism to load balance over unequal cost paths (or called unequal cost load balancing) through the “variance” command. In other words, EIGRP will install all paths with metric < variance * best_metric into the local routing table, provided that it meets the feasibility condition to prevent routing loop. The path that meets this requirement is called a feasible successor. If a path is not a feasible successor, it is not used in load balancing.

Note: The feasibility condition states that, the Advertised Distance (AD) of a route must be lower than the feasible distance of the current successor route.

Question 6

Explanation

OTP leverages existing LISP encapsulation which:
+ Allows dynamic multi-point tunneling (-> Answer A is correct)
+ Provides instance ID field to optionally support virtualization across WAN (see EVN WAN Extension section)
OTP does NOT use LISP control plane (map server/resolver, etc.) (-> Therefore answer B is not correct) instead it uses EIGRP to exchange routes and provide the next-hop (-> answer C and answer D are not correct), which LISP encapsulation uses to reach remote prefixes.

Reference: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/ios-nx-os-software/ip-routing/whitepaper_C11-730404.html

Question 7

Explanation

When OSPF adjacency is formed, a router goes through several state changes before it becomes fully adjacent with its neighbor. The states are Down -> Attempt (optional) -> Init -> 2-Way -> Exstart -> Exchange -> Loading -> Full. Short descriptions about these states are listed below:

Down: no information (hellos) has been received from this neighbor.

Attempt: only valid for manually configured neighbors in an NBMA environment. In Attempt state, the router sends unicast hello packets every poll interval to the neighbor, from which hellos have not been received within the dead interval.

Init: specifies that the router has received a hello packet from its neighbor, but the receiving router’s ID was not included in the hello packet
2-Way: indicates bi-directional communication has been established between two routers.

Exstart: Once the DR and BDR are elected, the actual process of exchanging link state information can start between the routers and their DR and BDR.

Exchange: OSPF routers exchange database descriptor (DBD) packets

Loading: In this state, the actual exchange of link state information occurs

Full: routers are fully adjacent with each other

(Reference: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080093f0e.shtml)

Neighbors Stuck in Exstart/Exchange State
The problem occurs most frequently when attempting to run OSPF between a Cisco router and another vendor’s router. The problem occurs when the maximum transmission unit (MTU) settings for neighboring router interfaces don’t match. If the router with the higher MTU sends a packet larger that the MTU set on the neighboring router, the neighboring router ignores the packet.

Question 8

Explanation

EIGRP support unequal-cost load balancing via the “variance …” while OSPF only supports equal-cost load balancing.

Question 9

Explanation

The Broadcast network type is the default for an OSPF enabled ethernet interface (while Point-to-Point is the default OSPF network type for Serial interface with HDLC and PPP encapsulation).

Reference: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/cisco-ios-cookbook/0596527225/ch08s15.html

Question 10

Explanation

Summary ASBR LSA (Type 4) – Generated by the ABR to describe an ASBR to routers in other areas so that routers in other areas know how to get to external routes through that ASBR. For example, suppose R8 is redistributing external route (EIGRP, RIP…) to R3. This makes R3 an Autonomous System Boundary Router (ASBR). When R2 (which is an ABR) receives this LSA Type 1 update, R2 will create LSA Type 4 and flood into Area 0 to inform them how to reach R3. When R5 receives this LSA it also floods into Area 2.

In the above example, the only ASBR belongs to area 1 so the two ABRs (R2 & R5) send LSA Type 4 to area 0 & area 2 (not vice versa). This is an indication of the existence of the ASBR in area 1.

OSPF_LSAs_Types_4.jpg

Note:
+ Type 4 LSAs contain the router ID of the ASBR.
+ There are no LSA Type 4 injected into Area 1 because every router inside area 1 knows how to reach R3. R3 only uses LSA Type 1 to inform R2 about R8 and inform R2 that R3 is an ASBR.

Comments
  1. mofumofu
    April 30th, 2020

    Question 5
    Why is Answer A the correct answer?
    In the end, the only routes that can be used are the Successors and Feasible Successors, so I guess it will be “EIGRP supports 2 unequal-cost paths”.
    It seems to me that Answer E is correct.
    https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/enhanced-interior-gateway-routing-protocol-eigrp/16406-eigrp-toc.html#feasibleandreported

  2. Gre47
    May 19th, 2020

    Mofumofu
    Here says:
    EIGRP Load Balancing
    Every routing protocol supports equal cost path load balancing. In addition, Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP) and EIGRP also support unequal cost path load balancing. Use the variance n command in order to instruct the router to include routes with a metric of less than n times the minimum metric route for that destination. The variable n can take a value between 1 and 128. The default is 1, which means equal cost load balancing. Traffic is also distributed among the links with unequal costs, proportionately, with respect to the metric.

    Note: If a path is not a feasible successor, the path is not used in load balancing.

    So A and B are indeed the correct answers.

  3. Tosha
    May 29th, 2020

    Question 1

    Which OSPF networks types are compatible and allow communication through the two peering devices?
    A. broadcast to nonbroadcast
    B. point-to-multipoint to nonbroadcast
    C. broadcast to point-to-point
    D. point-to-multipoint to broadcast

    Broadcast
    Hello: 10 Wait: 40 Dead: 40

    Non-broadcast
    Hello: 30 Wait: 120 Dead: 120

    Point-to-point
    Hello: 10 Wait: 40 Dead: 40

    Point-to- multipoint
    Hello: 30 Wait: 120 Dead: 120

    Two options suit, B, C
    If im not correct, please let me know

  4. Tosha
    May 29th, 2020

    got it, by adjusting hello/dead timers. answer is A, as they are compatible, cause elect DR/BDR

  5. Lost again
    May 29th, 2020

    I can not see the Q’s I only see the explanation please help

  6. Chromatica
    May 30th, 2020

    The correct answer of question 6 is: A. OTP uses LISP encapsulation for dynamic multipoint tunneling. EIGRP OTP uses EIGRP for control plane and LISP for data plane exclusively. As LISP is used for the traffic in the WAN, indeed: the IP-in-IP/UDP LISP encapsulation makes dynamic multipoint between the different RLOCs between all the CEs-PEs links connected to the WAN in order to transport data between different points across the ISP. It is true that next-hop addresses and neighborships are on EIGRP control plane functions, but it is false thar OTP maintains LISP control plane.

  7. jlai
    May 31st, 2020

    @Chromatica I agree answer should be A

  8. jlai
    June 2nd, 2020

    I hope they will update the answers on the site and on the composite quizzes as well. its getting confusing now whenever i practice on the quiz. if thats the case then my money is not worth it. :(

  9. jlai
    June 2nd, 2020

    This was already updated by digitaltut correct answer is A.

    Question 6
    Which statement about LISP encapsulation in an EIGRP OTP implementation is true?

    A. OTP uses LISP encapsulation for dynamic multipoint tunneling
    B. OTP maintains the LISP control plane
    C. OTP uses LISP encapsulation to obtain routes from neighbors
    D. LISP learns the next hop

    Answer: A

  10. rmar
    June 17th, 2020

    @Digitaltut please, could you update this answer in pdf ENCOR_Mar_2020.pdf?

    Thanks

  1. No trackbacks yet.