Home > Share your ROUTE v2.0 Experience

Share your ROUTE v2.0 Experience

January 22nd, 2015 in ROUTE 300-101 Go to comments

The ROUTE 300-101 (ROUTE v2.0) exam has been used to replace the old ROUTE 642-902 exam so this article is devoted for candidates who took this exam sharing their experience.

Please tell with us what are your materials, the way you learned, your feeling and experience after taking the ROUTE v2.0 exam… But please DO NOT share any information about the detail of the exam or your personal information, your score, exam date and location, your email…

Note: Posting email is not allowed in the comment section.

Your posts are warmly welcome!

Comments
Comment pages
1 116 117 118 1008
  1. Amy91
    April 24th, 2018

    Please please can anyone tell me what the latest version of 477q dumps is and where to find it?

    The last one I have is from March, is there an updated one?

    If anyone has it and would like some good karma then please send it to amydell91 @ gmail com :)))

  2. 1000
    April 24th, 2018

    me also please leute help us and add the latest version in this page

  3. Amy91
    April 24th, 2018

    @1000

    If I ever find it I will be sure to share it with everyone :)

  4. Anonymous
    April 24th, 2018

    anyone remember “logging console 7” question?

  5. 1000
    April 24th, 2018

    that is my email rose3nk @ gmail.com

  6. IwillFirstReadTheForumAtLeastThePageBeforeThisOne
    April 24th, 2018

    Guys are you serious? Have you ever read at least few pages before? I mean like at least one page before this one? Dont be so lazy guys!!!! Thx.

  7. IwillFirstReadTheForumAtLeastThePageBeforeThisOne
    April 24th, 2018

    I was reacting to “please share it”

  8. mosh
    April 24th, 2018

    Hi @prince, could your re-share 477q dumps and vce and other latest materials.. I backread until page 110 and got confused. Thank you very much!

  9. saailg
    April 24th, 2018

    Pass with 9xx/1000 marks

    https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ovDnMnnpPZprfEc7p96T5hCP5QeRLYfQ

    You need to study ipv6, eigrp, ospf, vrf-lite/evn, concepts

    i had ospf eval sim, eigrp eval sim, eigrp stub sim and AAA, DHCP, Frame-Relay LMI

    now moving to TSHOOT

  10. Amy91
    April 24th, 2018

    @IwillFirstReadTheForumAtLeastThePageBeforeThisOne

    What are your referring to? Everyone keeps talking about 477q but no one ever actually posts any real links

  11. airon
    April 24th, 2018

    Hello @mosh

    forum page 100 -> other materials -> at dropbox link
    forum page 108 -> corrected by Prince 477q (v31) -> at dropbox link
    forum page 111 -> 91q the most valid :-) made from 477q by Prince ->-> at dropbox link
    Forum page 115 DND (from Jazzy – link there)

  12. CCNP 10
    April 25th, 2018

    Hello Guys

    which is the correct answer for this Q. ( as per digitaltut is this one but the 91 prince vce is other one )

    9TUT :

    Question 5
    What are two limitations when in use of NPTv6 for IPV6 vs IPV6 Address translation? (Choose two)
    A. stateful address translation
    B. a limit of 32 1-to-1 translations
    C. lack of overloading functionality
    D. identify all interfaces as NAT inside or outside
    E. 1-to-1 prefix rewrite
    F. mismatched prefix allocations

    Answer: C F
    Explanation
    The IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation (NPTv6) provides a mechanism to translate an inside IPv6 source address prefix to outside IPv6 source address prefix in IPv6 packet header and vice-versa. In other words, NPTv6 is simply rewriting IPv6 prefixes. NPTv6 does not allow to overload. It does not support mismatching prefix allocations sizes (so the network/host portion remains intact. For example you cannot cover /64 to /48).

    ===========================

    91 Prince VCE.

    C and E

  13. c1sc0g33k
    April 25th, 2018

    @CCNP 10: The correct answer is CE

  14. Dan_2_One
    April 25th, 2018

    are you sure? im pretty sure its C F

  15. c1sc0g33k
    April 25th, 2018

    @Dan_2_One not 100% sure

Comment pages
1 116 117 118 1008
  1. No trackbacks yet.